Scientific Method Process September 6, 2008
Posted by iwanthho in Garage, On-Demand.Tags: experiment, HHO, Kids club, method, NASA, process, scientific
add a comment
If we do not understand this term fully then a little help from children is in order.
I watch the NASA channel a lot and they have a kids program that I have a great deal of respect for. The Tree House Detectives, is a program aimed at Elementary to Junior High Youth to inspire learning and science development. I have found a wealth of important principals that I need for problem solving.
Here is the NASA website for the program
http://scifiles.larc.nasa.gov/
Here is a explanation of it well done at Science Buddies
http://www.sciencebuddies.org/mentoring/project_scientific_method.shtml
So you got your HHO cell making gas now how can you make it more efficient.
- What is it’s efficiency?
- What does research tell me about the result?
- What part do I change?
- How does it compare to Michael Faraday?
- What is taking place chemically for what my result is?
- Did I write down the variables and outcome of this experiment?
- Do I need to take a continuing educations class in Physics on Electrical Engineering?
I think this method does in no way quench creativity or inspiration. I wish only for us all to be successful and when the breakthrough comes we can know exactly how it happened and not lose what has been gained.
I have a while to go before I feel that I have experimental data to offer for review, but I hope that I will. This type of work is exciteting and promising but it needs credibility in the data. I like it when the experimenter talks out what they have went thought and describes the results. A standard benchmark to compare results with enough information to duplicate the experiment. That is called “peer review”. Laboratory Instrument are so rarely used because of budget constraints. There are ways of making measurements or getting in contact with a high school chemistry teacher who might even want to invole there class. A key that unlocks the door you have been struggling with might only be kept by someone else.
We need to be standing on the shoulders of giants not reinventing the wheel each time. This blog is for me but I hope it encourage you too.
Understanding a feedback circuit September 4, 2008
Posted by iwanthho in Blogroll, Garage, On-Demand.Tags: earthquake, electrolysis, feedback, frequency, harmonics, HHO, Hydrogen, Mythbusters, oscillator, tesla, wave
add a comment
Real world physical examples based on tesla’s earthquake experiments.
1. I was enjoying our cheep sams intex 18′ dia pool and I was the only one in it. and started to exercise my arms against the water. I just can’t get it out of me but I turn everything into an experiment. It is a round shape and from a perfect calm I watched the wave action interact with the sides as I used my hand to instigate a wave front. As the first wave makes it way back to me at least 10 to 15 wavelet are crossing over one another. Here is where the wave increases or is canceled out. I wonder in an infinite pool size how far the wave would go? The side are not solid, they rebound and effect the energy of the wave too.
I can make a simple feedback circuit - my hand is frequency input, my eyes are loosely connect to the wave height but not effect them and my brain adjusts the timing and frequency. The new input needs to be just as the wave rebounds away from me and behind it’s crest. ( Note: If you try this at home you not want to have anybody watching, way to hard to explain if they don’t understand. ) The important thing to remember is that my ability to increase the wave height is not based on water density, volume or depth or size of the pool, temperature, etc… Just the feedback of information. The other thing observed is that to much energy put in just was wasted as heat ( my muscle and tiredness ) too much frequency or too much breaking of the waters tension ( splashing ). So how little energy can I put in and get a satisfying wave height? You just have to get good at the timing.
2. Months later setting at my old 3′ x 5′ particle board desk at work which has a typical loose plastic cam lock holding it all together. and about 50 lbs of monitor and computer on it. I watched my coffee in the cup slosh back and forth when I bumped the side of the desk. Hum… same thing as the pool, bumping the desk at different frequencies the slosh got nulled out or magnified. The desk had a harmonic frequency. The loose frame, the size of the side board combine with the weight. “Pendulum” the coffee cup was just the detector. or was it involved?
3. NASA and other researchers have reported the the study of the suns surface has a fluctuation, vibrating as it where. And we have all heard about the background noise from the universe. As pointed out that basicly everything is singing with it’s own tune. Just like in “Happy Feet”.
4. In an episode of Mythbusters. they used an electromagnetic weighted oscillator and tuned it to different frequencies and had it clamped to a bridge to test the earthquake principle. but I say the critical element to all these experiments, is that you have to listen. They got the bridge to vibrate a little but no real result. Not as the tesla report that the whole area where the building he was at was about to crumble. Is the report exaggerated? I don’t know.
5. One of my volunteer jobs that I enjoyed was running a soundboard. This is great practical experience with feedback the one thing you do not want as a sound man. Understanding it is a key to stopping it in sound reinforcement. We want our HHO electrolysis to “squeal”. This is the absolute answer to making these things work. Uncontrolled feedback is very powerful and capable of damaging speakers and ears but remember the gain is not any higher. So output is greater than input. As the cascade of loops build upon themselves, only the new input is added to the whole. Gaining power on each pass thought the amplifying system. but how does it know how to add the power at the right time? Because it only accrues at it’s room harmonics. So by parametrically eqing or “target out that frequency” you drastically remove the potential for it bother your audience. Can we do the opposite and get the squeal we need or to say it like Stanley Meyers did let the voltage do the work.
A Cleaner Future September 2, 2008
Posted by iwanthho in Fuel Cell, On-Demand, Public Awareness.Tags: Fuel Cell, greenhouse effect, HHO, Hydrogen, Hydrogen on Demand, hydroxy, Oxyhydrogen, run your car on water, Stanley Meyers, water fuel cell, Zero Emission
add a comment
Can we use a shared community of information to solve a planet wide problem without polution?
I have been googling and youtube surfing for 3 years to try to find a answer to that question. When I first saw the hho gas bubble off Stanley Meyers Machine I was hooked. It looked so easy just send the right pulses of electricity into the tap water and more energy come out than in. Well it is not that simple. Sadly he passes away leaving only a mystery behind and what most believe a set of patents that intentionally lead you away from the real way the machine did the work.
Many are finding clues to there working examples. But think of just how many variable there are to over come. Water is only made of 2 molecules but it still is not fully understood. We know a lot, but it is solluble with other molecules which effect the properties you are adjusting for. Component fluctuations from temperature. Source voltage variations. Coil and capacitor unpredictability interactions, Water salinity, ph, resistance and contaminates. And it goes on…
Sounds impossible to account for all of those variables. Made be not. at least that is what we dreamers think.


