Understanding a feedback circuit September 4, 2008
Posted by iwanthho in Blogroll, Garage, On-Demand.Tags: earthquake, electrolysis, feedback, frequency, harmonics, HHO, Hydrogen, Mythbusters, oscillator, tesla, wave
trackback
Real world physical examples based on tesla’s earthquake experiments.
1. I was enjoying our cheep sams intex 18′ dia pool and I was the only one in it. and started to exercise my arms against the water. I just can’t get it out of me but I turn everything into an experiment. It is a round shape and from a perfect calm I watched the wave action interact with the sides as I used my hand to instigate a wave front. As the first wave makes it way back to me at least 10 to 15 wavelet are crossing over one another. Here is where the wave increases or is canceled out. I wonder in an infinite pool size how far the wave would go? The side are not solid, they rebound and effect the energy of the wave too.
I can make a simple feedback circuit - my hand is frequency input, my eyes are loosely connect to the wave height but not effect them and my brain adjusts the timing and frequency. The new input needs to be just as the wave rebounds away from me and behind it’s crest. ( Note: If you try this at home you not want to have anybody watching, way to hard to explain if they don’t understand. ) The important thing to remember is that my ability to increase the wave height is not based on water density, volume or depth or size of the pool, temperature, etc… Just the feedback of information. The other thing observed is that to much energy put in just was wasted as heat ( my muscle and tiredness ) too much frequency or too much breaking of the waters tension ( splashing ). So how little energy can I put in and get a satisfying wave height? You just have to get good at the timing.
2. Months later setting at my old 3′ x 5′ particle board desk at work which has a typical loose plastic cam lock holding it all together. and about 50 lbs of monitor and computer on it. I watched my coffee in the cup slosh back and forth when I bumped the side of the desk. Hum… same thing as the pool, bumping the desk at different frequencies the slosh got nulled out or magnified. The desk had a harmonic frequency. The loose frame, the size of the side board combine with the weight. “Pendulum” the coffee cup was just the detector. or was it involved?
3. NASA and other researchers have reported the the study of the suns surface has a fluctuation, vibrating as it where. And we have all heard about the background noise from the universe. As pointed out that basicly everything is singing with it’s own tune. Just like in “Happy Feet”.
4. In an episode of Mythbusters. they used an electromagnetic weighted oscillator and tuned it to different frequencies and had it clamped to a bridge to test the earthquake principle. but I say the critical element to all these experiments, is that you have to listen. They got the bridge to vibrate a little but no real result. Not as the tesla report that the whole area where the building he was at was about to crumble. Is the report exaggerated? I don’t know.
5. One of my volunteer jobs that I enjoyed was running a soundboard. This is great practical experience with feedback the one thing you do not want as a sound man. Understanding it is a key to stopping it in sound reinforcement. We want our HHO electrolysis to “squeal”. This is the absolute answer to making these things work. Uncontrolled feedback is very powerful and capable of damaging speakers and ears but remember the gain is not any higher. So output is greater than input. As the cascade of loops build upon themselves, only the new input is added to the whole. Gaining power on each pass thought the amplifying system. but how does it know how to add the power at the right time? Because it only accrues at it’s room harmonics. So by parametrically eqing or “target out that frequency” you drastically remove the potential for it bother your audience. Can we do the opposite and get the squeal we need or to say it like Stanley Meyers did let the voltage do the work.

Comments»
No comments yet — be the first.